Healthcare.gov We Werent Able to Upload Your Document at This Time. Please Try Again Later.

Health insurance substitution website

HealthCare.gov
HealthCare.gov logo.png

Screenshot of HealthCare.gov

Healthcare.gov as it appeared on January 5, 2016

Healthcare.gov as it appeared on January five, 2016

Type of site

Health insurance market
Available in English
Castilian
Owner U.South. Department of Health and Human Services
URL www.healthcare.gov (English)
www.cuidadodesalud.gov (Spanish)
Launched Oct 1, 2013; 8 years ago  (2013-10-01)
Electric current status Active

HealthCare.gov (Spanish: CuidadodeSalud.gov) is a wellness insurance exchange website operated under the U.s. federal government nether the provisions of the Affordable Care Human activity (ACA, often referred as 'Obamacare'), which currently serves the residents of the U.South. states which have opted non to create their own land exchanges.[one] [ better source needed ] The exchange facilitates the sale of private health insurance plans to residents of the United States[2] and offers subsidies to those who earn between 1 and four times the federal poverty line, but non to those earning less than the federal poverty line.[three] The website as well assists those persons who are eligible to sign up for Medicaid, and has a separate market for pocket-size businesses.

The October 1, 2013 roll-out of HealthCare.gov went through as planned, despite the concurrent partial authorities shutdown. Yet, the launch was marred by serious technological problems, making information technology difficult for the public to sign upwardly for wellness insurance.[4] The deadline to sign upward for coverage that would begin January 2014 was Dec 23, 2013, past which time the problems had largely been fixed. The open enrollment period for 2016 coverage ran from November 1, 2015 to January 31, 2016.[5] Country exchanges also have had the same deadlines; their performance has been varied.[half-dozen] [7] [viii]

The pattern of the website was overseen by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and built by a number of federal contractors, most prominently CGI Group of Canada. The original budget for CGI was $93.7 million, but this grew to $292 one thousand thousand prior to launch of the website. While estimates that the overall cost for building the website had reached over $500 1000000 prior to launch[1] [9] [10] [11] [12] and in early 2014 HHS Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell said at that place would be "approximately $834 million on Marketplace-related It contracts and interagency agreements,"[thirteen] the Office of Inspector General released a report in August 2014 finding that the full price of the HealthCare.gov website had reached $1.7 billion[14] and a month later, including costs beyond "calculator systems," Bloomberg News estimated information technology at $2.ane billion.[15] On July 30, 2014, the Regime Accountability Office released a not-partisan study that ended the administration did not provide "effective planning or oversight practices" in developing the HealthCare.gov website.[16]

Background and functionality [edit]

Medicaid expansion through the PPACA by state:

 Expanding Medicaid

 Not expanding Medicaid

 Still debating Medicaid expansion

The site functions equally a clearing house to allow Americans to compare prices on wellness insurance plans in their states, to begin enrollment in a called programme, and to simultaneously find out if they qualify for government healthcare subsidies.[4] Visitors sign up and create their own specific user business relationship starting time, listing some personal information, before receiving detailed data about what is available in their area. Designed to aid the millions of uninsured Americans, the comparison shopping features involve a visual format somewhat analogous to websites such as Amazon.com and Etsy.[two] [eleven]

HealthCare.gov also details Medicaid options for individuals. This relates to an expansion of the long-running program undertaken as a joint effort under the PPACA.[17] The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected that the exchange would be used past an estimated 7 one thousand thousand Americans to obtain coverage during the first twelvemonth after its launch;[4] current estimates suggest that the combined effigy is slightly to a higher place viii million.[xviii]

Development and history [edit]

President Barack Obama signed the Affordable Care Act (ACA) into police force on March 23, 2010 in the East Room before a select audience of nearly 300. He stated that the health reform attempt, designed later on a long and acrimonious debate facing fierce opposition in the U.Southward. Congress to expand wellness insurance coverage, was based on "the core principle that everybody should have some basic security when it comes to their health care".[19] The primary purpose of the ACA was to increase coverage to the American people either through public or private insurance and control healthcare costs. The Congressional Budget Office(CBO) estimated that the ACA would reduce the number of uninsured past 32 1000000 increasing coverage for the non-elderly citizens from 83 to 94 per cent. Insurers were not immune to deny insurance to applicants with pre-existing conditions.[20] The Sunlight Foundation has stated that at least forty-seven private company contractors have been involved with the ACA in some capacity as of fall 2013, with the measure causing a wide variety of policy changes.[ii] Journalists writing for The New York Times have called the ACA "the about expansive social legislation enacted in decades".[19]

A report past Reuters described HealthCare.gov itself equally the "key" to the reform measure.[9] Evolution of the website's interface as well as its supporting dorsum-end services, to brand sure that the website could piece of work to help people compare between wellness insurance plans, were both outsourced to private companies. The front-end of the website was adult by the startup Development Seed.[2] The back-terminate work was contracted out to CGI Federal Inc., a subsidiary of the Canadian It multinational CGI Grouping, which subcontracted the work to other companies as is common on big authorities contracts.[11] CGI was also responsible for edifice some of the state-level healthcare exchanges, with varying levels of success (some did not open on schedule).[9]

Kathleen Sebelius and Todd Park, main technology officeholder of the Section of Health.

According to author and journalist John J. Xenakis,[ meliorate source needed ] [21] CGI Federal's try in Massachusetts is characterized every bit a complete failure. In Xenakis' view, despite the Massachusetts connector being the type of website which a modest team of five to ten could create in a few months on a x meg dollar budget, a team of around 300 with a 200 million dollar budget failed. Xenakis claims CGI Federal were likely to have hired many incompetent programmers due to Massachusetts transferring the development contract to another firm, Optum Inc. The software created by CGI was of poor quality and unusable by Optum, who had to showtime from scratch. CGI has also been accused of committing fraudulent tests and reports to those in charge of oversight.[22] Like problems occurred in many other states.[22] [ citation needed ] [ better source needed ]

According to John J. Xenakis,[ improve source needed ] the Obama administration granted way as well much money to create the federal and individual country websites, which led to large, unmanageable teams which independent many incompetent programmers. Information technology as well encouraged fraud and overspending by programmers.[22] [ commendation needed ] [ better source needed ]

Specifically, aspects of HealthCare.gov relating to digital identity authentication were assigned to Experian. Quality Software Services, Inc. (QSSI) also played a part. The full number of companies enlisted in the website's creation, and their names, has not been disclosed by the Department of Health and Human Services.[11] The whole effort was officially coordinated past the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), an agency that commentators such equally journalists David Perera and Sean Gallagher take speculated was ill-suited to that task. Social activist and technologist Clay Johnson later said that the federal regime had issues come up given that it "leans towards a write-down-all-the-requirements-then-build-to-those-requirements blazon of methodology" not well suited to electric current Information technology[23] especially when government contractors are focused on maximizing profits.[24]

"The firms that typically get contracts are the firms that are good at getting contracts, non typically good at executing on them," Alex Howard, a fellow at the Harvard Ash Eye for Autonomous Governance and Innovation, remarked to The Verge equally he evaluated the back-end of the project. In contrast, the spider web-mag'south journalist Adrianne Jeffries praised the successful utilise of an "innovative" startup business concern for the front-end. Nevertheless, she institute the overall rollout "bone-headed".[11]

The Obama administration repeatedly modified regulations and policies until summer 2013, meaning contractors had to deal with irresolute requirements. However, changing requirements are by no ways unusual in a large, expensive custom software project; they are a well-known factor in historical project failures, and methodologies such as agile software evolution have been developed to cope with them. Unfortunately, regulations pertaining to big government contracts in many countries, including the U.s., are not a good match for active software evolution.[2]

Statistics [edit]

Analysis by the Reuters news agency in mid-Oct stated that the total contract-based cost of building HealthCare.gov swelled threefold from its initial gauge of $93.7 meg to about $292 million.[9] In August 2014, the Office of Inspector General released a report finding that the cost of the HealthCare.gov website had reached $1.vii billion.[14] Equally pointed out later by commentators such as Marker Steyn, the CGI company had already been embroiled in a mid-2000s controversy before over contract payments. While devising the Canadian Firearms Registry, estimated costs of $2 one thousand thousand ballooned to about $ii billion.[25]

On March 25, 2019, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reported that eleven.iv million Americans had selected enrolled in or automatically renewed their Exchange coverage during the 2019 Open Enrollment Menstruum.[26]

Concerns about the website [edit]

Problems during launch [edit]

Health insurance exchange functionality by state:[27]

 Creating state-operated exchanges

 Establishing state-federal partnership exchanges

 Defaulting to federal commutation

The HealthCare.gov website was launched on the scheduled appointment of Oct 1, 2013. Although the government shutdown began on the same day, HealthCare.gov was one of the federal government websites that remained open through the events. Although it appeared to be upward and running normally, visitors quickly encountered numerous types of technical problems,[11] [28] and, by some estimates, only one% of interested people were able to enroll to the site in the first week of its operations.[2] Even for those that did manage to enroll, insurance providers afterward reported some instances of applications submitted through the site with required information missing.[29]

In Bloomberg Businessweek journalist Paul Ford summed upwardly the issue by remarking, "Regardless of your opinions on the health-care law, this is the wrong mode to make software." He also wrote, "In the meantime, information technology'due south articulate that tens of millions of dollars have been spent to launch something broken."[2] A ConsumerReports.org article re-iterated previous communication, with the group recommending for people to stay "abroad from HealthCare.gov for at to the lowest degree some other calendar month". The grouping stated as well, "Hopefully that volition be long enough for its software vendors to clean up the mess they've made."[29]

In its third week of operations, technical bug continued. A CNN.com article highlighted the "maddeningly long wait times" as an upshot.[nine] A variety of other issues included broken pull-down menus that accept only worked intermittently, for example.[17]

Todd Park, the U.Southward. chief technology officer, initially said on October vi that the glitches[ description needed ] were caused by unexpected high volume when the site drew 250,000 simultaneous users instead of the fifty,000-sixty,000 expected. He claimed that the site would take worked with fewer simultaneous users. More than 8.one million people visited the site from October 1 to iv.[17] White Firm officials subsequently conceded that it was non just an consequence of volume, but involved software and systems design problems.[4] For example, consumers are required to create an account before being able to compare plans, and the registration process may take created a bottleneck that led to the long await times.[30] Also, stress tests washed past contractors 1 day earlier the launch appointment revealed that the site became as well slow with only i,100 simultaneous users, nowhere most even the 50,000-lx,000 expected.[31]

Despite later on comments, concerns about the readiness of the exchanges had been raised in March 2013, by Henry Chao, the deputy principal information officeholder at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), who had said that "allow's but make sure it's not a third-world experience". A colleague of his, Gary Cohen, had also remarked, "Everyone recognizes that day 1 will not be perfect." Even by 2011, when the CMS awarded its individual sector contracts, most of the PPACA regulations and implementation measures were nonetheless in flux.[ix]

The New York Times and The Washington Post reported in November 2013 that the Obama assistants brought in consulting firm McKinsey & Company to assess the website. Their written report, delivered in March 2013, warned that the endeavor to build the HealthCare.gov site was falling behind and was at risk of failure unless immediate steps were taken to right the bug.[32] [33]

On Oct 21, 2013, President Barack Obama addressed the technical problems and other issues in a thirty-minute printing briefing at the White House Rose Garden, saying that at that place was "no alibi" for them. He remarked, "There's no saccharide coating: the website has been too dull, people have been getting stuck during the awarding process and I think it's fair to say that nobody's more frustrated by that than I am." He too stated that a "tech surge" was underway to set up the problems.[4] The President additionally pointed out that people could instead apply through a call center or in person.[29]

White House Printing Secretarial assistant Jay Carney said more fourth dimension was needed to become the website working properly. Carney as well hinted that if the issues remained unresolved for such a long time that it prevented people from meeting their legal obligation to obtain insurance in fourth dimension for the February deadline, the legal penalty for not obtaining insurance would not be applicable because the Obamacare law states that if affordable intendance is non available, the penalisation volition not be payable.[29]

So, shortly later HealthCare.gov's launch, the problems still did not affect the legal requirement for Americans to accept health insurance by December xv, which remained on the books as stated.[11] However, on October 23, the effective legal deadline for applying for health insurance via HealthCare.gov without getting a punishment via the individual mandate was extended to March 31, 2014, perhaps because of the problems with HealthCare.gov and some of the state healthcare exchanges (just without a de jure explanation equally such given).

The Obama administration appointed a contractor, Quality Software Services, Inc (QSSI), to coordinate the work of the fixing of the website issues. The visitor had already worked on the website's back-terminate before the website went live. As stated earlier, prior to the launch, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) had been playing the role of coordinator, but critics charged that it was ill-suited for such a systems integration function. The administration appointed Jeffrey Zients to act as their adviser in the matter.[34]

On October 25, Zients promised, in a conference call to the media, that the site would be working well "for the vast majority of users" by the end of November. He also claimed that 90% of visitors are at present able to complete the account-creation process and actually used HealthCare.gov to compare plans. Perhaps the largest issue he faces, as he acknowledged in the telephone call, are the error-riddled reports given to insurers, frequently messing up basic details such as an private'southward gender.[34]

Every bit stated before, HealthCare.gov issues have persisted even weeks after the launch. For example, a networking failure error at the related data services hub killed the website's functionality again October 28. This occurred the verbal day later Health and Human Services caput Kathleen Sebelius had highlighted the design of that data hub as a authorities success. All the same, state-based exchanges have mostly worked well in registering individuals during this time period, with CNN.com describing them as "largely error free".[6]

A large number of technical fixes took identify through October and November, with an NPR.org written report afterward remarking that the website seemed to be "working more than smoothly." Even so, on November 13, the Obama administration revealed that fewer than 27,000 people had signed up to private health insurance through the site.[35] By November 30, more 137,000 people had obtained wellness insurance through the federal website. That figure represented a stiff increase, but enrollment figures were still vastly beneath past U.S. government forecasts.[36]

Accenture was called to supersede CGI Group as the atomic number 82 contractor for the website in January 2014.[37]

A large upshot with hereafter enrollments is dealing with the accuracy of HealthCare.gov information sent to insurance companies. Every bit stated in an NPR.org article citing "standing problems" with HealthCare.gov, nearly one in ten enrollment notices have independent a significant error.[36]

A hacker broke into role of the HealthCare.gov insurance enrollment website in July and uploaded malicious software, according to federal officials.[38]

2015 open enrollment period [edit]

Enrollment for the 2015 year through the federal regime website, which serves 37 states with no enrollment websites, started at midnight of Nov 15, 2014, and ended on February fifteen, 2015.

The U.s.a. Section of Health and Homo Services reported a relatively smooth experience for users. Nonetheless, scattered reports of problems, such as blocking login access and long look times, were encountered. In one case a call heart worker told a reporter that resolving their issue may take v to seven business days.[39]

In Jan USA Today reported that more than health plans were offered in about 75% of counties for 2015, and while average insurance premium increased less than the average 10% annual jumps for plans before the Affordable Care Act, there were yet some very large increases.[twoscore]

State and federal wellness care exchanges have enrolled more than nine.v one thousand thousand people, merely the numbers vary. Florida accounted for almost a seventh of all people who have selected plans on the exchanges. Texas, withal, has the largest share of uninsured adults while enrollments lag.[forty]

2016 open enrollment period [edit]

The open enrollment flow for 2016 began on November i, 2015 and ended on Jan 31, 2016.[41]

Fake websites [edit]

Before HealthCare.gov went online, there was concern about misleading or simulated websites at the state or local level.[42] In early December 2013, a third fake wellness insurance site was shut downwardly in Kentucky.[43] California Autonomous Party politicians condemned a California Republican Party-created website which resembled the land'south official Obamacare sign-up website but provided political criticisms of the law instead of insurance coverage.[44] [45] [46]

Privately-operated exchanges [edit]

Partly in response to the Healthcare.gov outages, a number of privately operated services have launched to provide tools for consumers to calculate subsidy eligibility, as well as research, compare, and enroll for plans examples include HealthSherpa, Stride Health and HealthPocket.[47] In November 2013, HealthSherpa was launched by a team of coders in San Francisco and received media attending for its comparative ease of use.[48] [49] Critics pointed out that by focusing merely on providing information, the HealthSherpa site did not resolve some of the about difficult problems, including allowing consumers to actually enroll in a plan.[50] Footstep Health launched in 2014, and focused on simplifying health care enrollment past recommending plans to its users based on their data and offering a full service team on the phone who can help its users enroll in plans. The company saw early on success through partnerships with a number of large companies. By March 2014, HealthSherpa had become a full-service broker allowing users to enroll directly on the HealthSherpa site.[51]

Security [edit]

In July 2014 a hacker broke into a test server for healthcare.gov and uploaded malicious software.[52] Past the end of 2014 healthcare.gov had obviously rewritten a large portion of the site and moved important functions "server-side," instead of existence executed client-side in the user's web browser.[53]

Data privacy [edit]

The initial launch of healthcare.gov was plagued with security concerns and lead to information security experts publicly testifying earlier the Congressional Committee on Scientific discipline, Space and Technology[54] and others speaking to the authorities most security vulnerabilities in healthcare.gov.[55] David Kennedy was able to locate lxx,000 wellness records that were supposed to be individual, but were publicly available via a google dork.[56]

In that location are concerns that personal data put into the website may not exist secure in the manner that users wait: on Jan 24, 2015 Kevin Counihan, the C.E.O. of Healthcare.gov, addressed concerns about privacy on the federal website. He said they launched a review of their privacy policies, contracts for third-party tools and URL structure. He said that Healthcare.gov had encrypted a URL that contains data on users' income and age, and whether they were pregnant.[57]

On January. 20, 2015, the Associated Press reported in an commodity titled: "Government wellness care website quietly sharing personal data" that HealthCare.gov is providing admission to enrollees' personal data to private companies that specialize in advertising. The data may include age, income, Goose egg code, whether a person smokes, and if a person is pregnant. It may also include a computer's Internet address, which tin can identify a person'southward name or address when combined with other information nerveless by data brokers and online advertizement firms.

In that location is no evidence that this data has been misused, but connections to dozens of 3rd-political party tech firms were documented. Some of these companies were also collecting highly specific information.[58]

Copyright infringement [edit]

In Oct 2013, The Weekly Standard reported the site was violating the copyrights of SpryMedia, a Uk-based applied science company, by utilizing their software with the copyright notices removed. The software was DataTables, a free and open-source plugin for jQuery designed to ameliorate presentation of information, and was dual-licensed under the GNU GPL version two and a modified 3-clause BSD license.[59] HealthCare.gov subsequently rectified the license violation by providing appropriate attribution, license and copyright notices.[60]

Reception and possible ramifications [edit]

The technical problems were heavily criticized, and Republican representatives sent President Obama a listing of questions, enervating explanations for what went wrong. Some Republicans called for the Secretary of Health and Man Services, Kathleen Sebelius, to exist fired, because she oversaw the planning for the site launch.[thirty] Erstwhile White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs described the technical problems every bit "excruciatingly embarrassing", and he said that some people should be fired. Scott Amey of the Project on Government Oversight pointed to the evolution cost ceiling beingness raised from $93.7 million to $292 million, and he asked: "Where was the contract oversight?"[9]

American conservative commentators such every bit National Review writers Jonah Goldberg and Mark Steyn accept argued that the website'south launch was a disaster that presages larger issues throughout the entire law, with Goldberg asserting that "the Republicans who insisted that this monstrosity had to exist delayed are looking just a niggling bit more reasonable with every passing tick."[25] [61] In a statement, the Republican National Committee (RNC) responded to President Obama's comments that the "tech surge" was code for a "spending surge" and will waste product millions of dollars. Said argument also read, "The federal bureaucracy has proven itself also ho-hum, too bloated, too incompetent, and too outdated to manage America's wellness care."[62]

Speaker of the House John Boehner, a Republican Representative from Ohio, told reporters that throughout November "more than Americans are going to lose their health care than are going to sign up."[63] Ohio Governor John Kasich stated on NBC's Meet the Printing program on October 27 that the gyre-out has "got everybody only shaking their heads". He too added that it seemed highly likely that near Ohioans would pay more on the HealthCare.gov plans. Kentucky Governor Steve Beshear counter-argued that while the website didn't work well however that information technology before long would since HealthCare.gov represents "the time to come of health care", and he commented too, "You know, the communication I would requite the news media and the critics up hither is take a deep breath."[64]

The Daily Bear witness host Jon Stewart notably lampooned the HealthCare.gov controversy during an interview with Sebelius. He jokingly challenged her to an online race: "I'm going to try and download every moving picture ever made, and you're going to try to sign upwardly for Obamacare, and we'll see which happens first." She also faced grilling over the Obama administration's opposition to an extended individual mandate filibuster.[65]

Sebelius afterward said in response to criticism, "The bulk of people calling for me to resign I would say are people who I don't work for and who do non want this program to work in the outset identify". She as well said, "I have had frequent conversations with the President and I take committed to him that my role is to go the program up and running, and we will do just that." Her popularity in her native Kansas where she previously served every bit governor, according to University of Kansas political science professor Burdett Loomis, has spurred her on to stay on.[65]

U.S. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a Democratic Representative from California, commented about the controversy that she feels optimistic most things being fixed, saying "I take faith in engineering" besides as "while there are glitches, there are solutions, as well." Democrats in Congress take accused Republican critics of HealthCare.gov of acting in bad religion. "Nosotros want the procedure to ameliorate, only we're not interested in torpedoing the process," said Representative Xavier Becerra, another Democrat from California and chairman of the House Democratic Caucus.[63]

Republican Senator Marco Rubio has drafted legislation as a result of the controversy to delay the individual mandate. The proposed legislation has drawn scattered Autonomous support.[61] Professor and author Victor Lombardi commented to Bloomberg Businessweek that the website's issues "don't sound catastrophic", and he added that history "may guess this project as the goad that revolutionized the United States health-care organisation" such that "no 1 will remember a few hiccups at launch."[2]

Although the law that decreed the creation of HealthCare.gov has been divisive and political speculation has taken place, polling done by the Gallup organization around the time of the difficult roll-out notwithstanding take institute that a majority of Americans back up keeping at least some aspects of Obamacare. Specifically, just 29% of the public favoured a consummate repeal.[4] However, a joint The Washington Mail service and ABC News survey stated that 56% of respondents consider the website'due south bug a harbinger of other problems with the health care measure out.[29]

On October 29, 2013, Rep. Lee Terry (R, NE-two) introduced the Exchange Data Disclosure Act (H.R. 3362; 113th Congress).[66] The bill would require the United States Department of Health and Human Services to submit weekly reports to Congress almost the how many people are using HealthCare.gov and signing upwardly for health insurance.[67] These reports would be due every Mon until March 31, 2015 and would be available to the public.[68] The nib would "require weekly updates on the number of unique website visitors, new accounts, and new enrollments in a qualified health plan, also as the level of coverage," separating the data by country.[67] The neb would also require reports on efforts to fix the broken portions of the website.[67] The Firm was scheduled to vote on it on January x, 2014.

Kathleen Sebelius resigned as Secretary of Health and Homo Services on April ten, 2014. She was replaced by Sylvia Mathews Burwell on June 9.

See besides [edit]

  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
  • eHealthInsurance
  • Health care in the United states of america
  • Wellness intendance reform in the Us
  • Health care reforms proposed during the Obama administration
  • Health insurance coverage in the United states
  • Health insurance market place
  • List of failed and overbudget custom software projects
  • The Mythical Man-Month
  • Provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Human activity
  • U.s. Department of Wellness and Human Services

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b David Perera (16 October 2013). "HealthCare.gov problems spark federal IT recriminations". Fierce Government IT. Archived from the original on 2013-10-23. Retrieved 17 October 2013.
  2. ^ a b c d east f m h Paul Ford (16 Oct 2013). "The Obamacare Website Didn't Take to Neglect. How to Practise Better Side by side Time". Bloomberg Businessweek . Retrieved 17 October 2013.
  3. ^ Explaining Health Care Reform: Questions Nearly Wellness Insurance Subsidies, KFF, November 20th, 2018
  4. ^ a b c d e f "Obama addresses healthcare website glitches". BBC News. 21 October 2013. Retrieved 21 October 2013.
  5. ^ "Important Marketplace Deadlines - 2016 Open Enrollment dates". Healthcare.gov. Retrieved September 18, 2015.
  6. ^ a b Kevin Bohn; Gregory Wallace (October 28, 2013). "Obamacare malfunction shuts down awarding tool". CNN.com. Retrieved October 28, 2013.
  7. ^ "Massachusetts to sever human relationship with Health Insurance Exchange applied science vendor CGI". Masslive.com.
  8. ^ "Embrace Oregon: Feds blast state wellness insurance exchange and atomic number 82 contractor, Oracle". OregonLive.com.
  9. ^ a b c d e f 1000 Begley, Sharon (17 October 2013). "As Obamacare tech woes mounted, contractor payments soared". Reuters . Retrieved 17 October 2013.
  10. ^ We paid over $500 one thousand thousand for the Obamacare sites and all nosotros got was this lousy 404 by Andrew Couts, Digital Trends, October 8, 2013
  11. ^ a b c d due east f chiliad Adrianne Jeffries (8 October 2013). "Why Obama's HealthCare.gov launch was doomed to fail". The Verge . Retrieved 17 October 2013.
  12. ^ "HealthCare.gov's head tech guy is out". The Washington Post. 6 Nov 2013. Retrieved 7 November 2013.
  13. ^ Kessler, Glenn (16 September 2019). "Eric Trump'due south Iv-Pinocchio claim that the Obamacare website cost more than than Trump'southward border barrier". Washington Post . Retrieved 16 September 2019.
  14. ^ a b "An Overview of 60 Contracts That Contributed to the Development and Operation of the Federal Marketplace". 26 August 2014. Retrieved 1 November 2014.
  15. ^ Wayne, Alex (24 September 2014). "Obamacare Website Costs Exceed $ii Billion, Study Finds". Bloomberg News . Retrieved 16 September 2019.
  16. ^ Alonso-Zaldivar, Ricardo (July 31, 2014). "Probe exposes flaws backside HealthCare.gov rollout". AP News . Retrieved July 31, 2014.
  17. ^ a b c Tim Mullaney (half dozen October 2013). "Obama adviser: Need overwhelmed HealthCare.gov". Us Today . Retrieved 17 October 2013.
  18. ^ "State Marketplace Statistics, April 2014 - The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation". kff.org.
  19. ^ a b Robert Pear; Sheryl Gay Stolberg (March 24, 2010). "Obama Signs Wellness Care Overhaul Into Law". The New York Times . Retrieved Oct 27, 2013.
  20. ^ Evans, Brad (March 18, 2014). "The Obamacare Website". Ivey Publishing.
  21. ^ "Nearly John J. Xenakis". www.generationaldynamics.com . Retrieved 2020-07-22 .
  22. ^ a b c Xenakis, John J. (23 Baronial 2015). "Obamacare'due south Healthcare.gov -- The greatest software development disaster in history". Retrieved 26 October 2015.
  23. ^ "How Healthcare.gov Went Wrong". dobt.co.
  24. ^ Luke Chung (vii December 2013). "Too Big to Burn down: How Government Contractors on Healthcare.gov Maximize Profits". Retrieved 7 Dec 2013.
  25. ^ a b Mark Steyn (October 25, 2013). "Obamacare's Magical Thinkers". National Review . Retrieved Oct 26, 2013.
  26. ^ "CMS Issues the 2019 Commutation Open Enrollment Period Terminal Report | CMS". www.cms.gov . Retrieved 2019-04-19 .
  27. ^ "State Decisions For Creating Health Insurance Exchanges, equally of May 28, 2013 - Table". Kaiser Family Foundation. May 28, 2013.
    "State Decisions For Creating Wellness Insurance Exchanges, every bit of May 28, 2013 - Map". Kaiser Family Foundation. May 28, 2013.
  28. ^ Luke Chung (ane October 2013). "HealthCare.gov is a Technological Disaster". Retrieved 1 October 2013.
  29. ^ a b c d due east Cohen, Tom (21 Oct 2013). "Obama: No 'sugarcoating' problems with health website". CNN. Retrieved 21 October 2013.
  30. ^ a b Parsons, Christi; Levey, Noam (21 October 2013). "Obama on healthcare sign-up glitches: 'It'southward going to go fixed'". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved 21 October 2013.
  31. ^ Frank Thorp (six November 2013). "'Stress tests' show Healthcare.gov was overloaded". NBC News . Retrieved 18 Nov 2013.
  32. ^ Sharon LaFraniere; Eric Lipton (November eighteen, 2013). "Officials Were Warned About Health Site Woes". The New York Times . Retrieved Jan four, 2014.
  33. ^ Juliet Eilperin; Sandhya Somashekhar (November xviii, 2013). "Private consultants warned of risks earlier HealthCare.gov'south Oct. 1 launch". The Washington Post . Retrieved Jan 4, 2014.
  34. ^ a b Somashekhar, Sandhya (25 Oct 2013). "HealthCare.gov fixes won't be done until stop of November". The Washington Mail . Retrieved 25 October 2013.
  35. ^ Kellman, Laurie (Nov 13, 2013). "Fewer than 27,000 wellness care sign-ups through federal website; 79,000 more in land sites". Newser.com. Retrieved December 12, 2013.
  36. ^ a b Horsley, Scott (December 11, 2013). "Enrollment Jumps At HealthCare.gov, Though Totals All the same Lag". NPR.org. Retrieved December 12, 2013.
  37. ^ "Accenture chosen as pb contractor of Obamacare website". Yahoo!. Retrieved 28 February 2014.
  38. ^ Yadron, Danny (4 September 2014). "Hacker Breached HealthCare.gov Insurance Site". The Wall Street Journal . Retrieved 5 September 2014.
  39. ^ "State, federal insurance sites confront first-twenty-four hours hiccups". USA TODAY. xv November 2014.
  40. ^ a b "Florida tops Obamacare sign-ups; Texas lags". Us TODAY. 27 January 2015.
  41. ^ "2016 Open Enrollment dates". HealthCare.gov . Retrieved 2015-09-19 .
  42. ^ Kelsey, Miller (thirteen September 2013). "Officials Worry Imitation Health Commutation Websites Could Defraud, Confuse Consumers". Huffington Mail . Retrieved 4 December 2013.
  43. ^ Lisa, Bernard-Kuhn (iii Dec 2013). "Ky. shuts down 3rd fake Obamacare website". Cincinnati.com . Retrieved iv Dec 2013.
  44. ^ Melanie, Mason (4 December 2013). "Rep. Janice Hahn calls on land GOP to take down 'fake' Obamacare site". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved 4 December 2013.
  45. ^ ABC News. "California Republicans Defend False Obamacare Site". ABC News.
  46. ^ Los Angeles Times (ii Dec 2013). "An underhanded anti-Obamacare stunt by the California GOP [updated]". latimes.com.
  47. ^ Taylor, Erin Audrey; Carman, Katherine Grace; Lopez, Andrea; Muchow, Ashley N.; Roshan, Parisa; Eibner, Christine (2016). "Consumer Decisionmaking in the Health Intendance Marketplace". world wide web.rand.org . Retrieved 10 October 2019.
  48. ^ "South.F. programmers build alternative to HealthCare.gov". world wide web.cbsnews.com . Retrieved 2015-09-19 .
  49. ^ "Three Guys Built a Improve Healthcare.gov". Retrieved 2015-09-19 .
  50. ^ "Why HealthSherpa.com is not a replacement for Healthcare.gov [UPDATED]". Eastward Pluribus Unum . Retrieved 2015-09-19 .
  51. ^ Bidgood, Jess (2014-03-06). "More Than One Manner to Purchase a Programme". The New York Times - In Practice . Retrieved 2015-09-19 .
  52. ^ Yadron, Danny (September 4, 2014). "Hacker Breached HealthCare.gov Insurance Site". Wall Street Journal. (subscription required)
  53. ^ "Healthcare.gov Web Security Review". Planet Zuda. December xix, 2014. Archived from the original on three Apr 2015.
  54. ^ "Full Commission Hearing - Is My Data on Healthcare.gov Secure?". Congressional Committee on Science, Space and Technology. Archived from the original on 22 November 2013.
  55. ^ "Speaking to house oversight committee on healthcare.gov security". Archived from the original on 2015-04-07. Retrieved 2015-03-12 .
  56. ^ "Explaining security problems with healthcare.gov". TrustedSec.
  57. ^ North, Anna (23 Jan 2015). "Is Your Data Prophylactic at Healthcare.gov?". op-talk.blogs.nytimes.com . Retrieved 28 January 2015.
  58. ^ Alonso-Zaldivar, Ricardo; Gillum, Jack (20 January 2015). "Government health care website quietly sharing personal information". Associated Press. Retrieved twenty September 2015. The government's health insurance website is quietly sending consumers' personal data to private companies that specialize in advertizing and analyzing Cyberspace data for performance and marketing, The Associated Press has learned.
  59. ^ Bier, Jeryl (17 Oct 2013). "Obamacare Website Violates Licensing Agreement for Copyrighted Software". The Weekly Standard . Retrieved 29 March 2015.
  60. ^ Fran, Berkman (24 October 2013). "U.South. Government Fixes Copyright Violation in Healthcare.gov Code". Mashable. Retrieved 29 March 2015.
  61. ^ a b Jonah Goldberg (October 25, 2013). "Obamacare'southward Ticking Clock". National Review . Retrieved October 26, 2013.
  62. ^ "RNC Statement on ObamaCare'south Continuing Failures". Gop.com. October 21, 2013. Retrieved October 26, 2013.
  63. ^ a b Condon, Stephanie (October 23, 2013). "Amid HealthCare.gov problems, Democrats stay upbeat". CBS News. Retrieved October 26, 2013.
  64. ^ "October. 27: John Kasich, Steve Beshear, Patrick J. Geraghty, Andrea Mitchell, Peter King, Rick Santorum, Jennifer Granholm, Neera Tanden, Alex Castellanos, Brian Williams". NBC News - Meet The Press. October 27, 2013. Retrieved Oct 27, 2013.
  65. ^ a b Naylor, Brian (Oct 26, 2013). "'Loyal Soldier' Sebelius Vows To Stay Put, Ready HealthCare.gov". NPR.org. Retrieved Oct 26, 2013.
  66. ^ "H.R. 3362 - All Actions". United States Congress. Retrieved vii January 2014.
  67. ^ a b c Kasperowicz, Pete (4 January 2014). "Business firm GOP to demand O-Care updates". The Colina . Retrieved vii January 2014.
  68. ^ "Text of H.R. 3362". Govtrack.united states of america. Retrieved 7 January 2014.

Further reading [edit]

  • "The Secret Startup That Saved the Worst Website in America", The Atlantic, July 2015

External links [edit]

  • Official website
  • HHS.gov/HealthCare
  • HealthCare.gov Sends Personal Data to Dozens of Tracking Websites Electronic Borderland Foundation, 2015

frazierthouthe.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HealthCare.gov

Belum ada Komentar untuk "Healthcare.gov We Werent Able to Upload Your Document at This Time. Please Try Again Later."

Posting Komentar

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel